Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Life on the Lane: Satire gone too far?

Faculty and staff voice their opinions on a Drury publication

Published: Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Updated: Thursday, November 17, 2011 22:11


Editor's Note: Life on the Lane is an underground, independent publication created and distributed at Drury University. Its content contains satirical material and does not reflect the opinions of Drury University. This publication comes out every week on the campus and on the web.

Last Friday's Nov. 11 issue has stirred some controversy among members of the Drury campus.

An email stream circulated among Drury faculty and staff concerning the recent LOTL issue with an overwhelming call for a change in content.

As a genre, satire has a rich history of making people laugh, pointing out a community's foibles, and attempting to right social and political wrongs. While Life on the Lane promotes itself as participating in this genre, a number of us in the Drury community have noticed that it has, of late, taken a sharp turn away from satire and towards the promotion of hateful speech. Attacks on individuals on the basis of gender, race, or nationality are not in the tradition of satire. Instead, they are cruel and divisive, and sometimes xenophobic, sexist, homophobic, and racist. They do little to make readers laugh and to provide any sort of legitimate critique, and while critiques of institutions or governments are often necessarily anonymous to protect authors from reprisal, anonymous personal attacks are anything but courageous.

Historically, independent publications have played important roles in the cultural lives of universities across the nation. We encourage Life on the Lane to reflect on its own intentions, which seem to have become unusually mean-spirited, and consider another direction in its future issues.

Pamela Adelmann, Education

Charles Allen, Emeritus, Mathematics & Computer Science

Jeanie Allen, Behavioral Sciences

Wendy Anderson, Biology

Matt Battaglia, Residence Life

Leah Blakey, History

Jan Blue, Theatre

Cathy Blunk, Languages

Katherine E. Bohnenkamper, Olin Library

Greg Booker, Art & Art History, Communication

Jennifer Silva Brown, Behavioral Sciences

Peter Browning, Philosophy & Religion

Jana Bufkin, Behavioral Sciences

Jim Caffey, Physics

Teresa Carroll, Biology

Alberto Chamorro, Languages

Hueping Chin, History

Sara Cochran, Edward Jones Center

Keith Coates, Mathematics & Computer Science

Asikaa Cosgrove, Education

Chris Craig, Education

Don Deeds, Biology

Monty Dobson, History

Laurie Edmondson, Education

Lisa Esposito, Philosophy & Religion

Randy Fuller, English

Mark Geiss, Safety & Security

Katherine Gilbert, English

Cristina Gilstrap, Communication

Jonathan Groves, Communication

Kevin Henderson, English

Brant Hinrichs, Physics

Phyllis Holzenberg, Olin Library

Charlyn Ingwerson, English

Erin Kenny, History

Susan Kirby, Alumni & Development

Christopher Koch, Music

Vickie Luttrell, Behavioral Sciences

Krystal McCulloch, Alumni & Development

Diane McDowell, English

Patricia McEachern, Animal Rights

Peter Meidlinger, English

Bruce Moore, Architecture

Trish Morris, Behavioral Sciences

Steve Mullins, Economics

Elizabeth Nichols, Languages

Greg Ojakangas, Physics

Chris Panza, Philosophy & Religion

Tom Parker, Art & Art History

Ray Patton, History

Janis Prewitt, Business

Tim Robbins, Languages

Bob Robertson, Mathematics & Computer Science

Bill Rohlf, Business

Tom Russo, Art & Art History

Ron Schie, Communication

Rich Schur, English

Mick Sokol, Theatre

Craig Smith, Olin Library

Traci Sooter, Architecture

Lia Southern, Music

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

2 comments

Anonymous
Sun Nov 20 2011 11:09
I completely agree with the previous commenter that discomfort is necessary to effect change. However, I cannot fathom what kind of change the writers of LotL hope to bring about by calling foreign exchange students illegal immigrants, the V-warriors sluts, our only female dean a bitch, and soroity members whores. These are personal attacks and do not make a statement about Drury as a whole. While the writers of LotL have every right to voice their prejudicial beliefs, it is not appropriate for them to do so in a satirical publication. These statements neither expose an issue within the Drury community that should be corrected, nor are they funny at all. At this point, LotL ceases to be satire and simply becomes the racist, sexist ramblings of prejudiced individuals. In my opinion, the Drury staff have done more to create discomfort to bring about change than LotL ever will.
Anonymous
Fri Nov 18 2011 23:48
Freedom of speech has not always been liked thus causing people to try and silence those that say things that are not the feelings of the majority by censoring and by burning or banning books. At one point speaking out against racism, sexism and all the other things stated in this letter were considered against the norm, angered people, and those brave enough to say what they thought were attempted to be silenced. However, these teachers (In above letter) would call many of those people heroes of their time for standing up for good and changing the horrible in society. However, as soon as an article comes out they do not like (faculty of gp21 in particular) they say that the mirror should go a different direction and in effect want this to stop. Causing me to think suppression on the freedom of speech they have previously fought so hard for. Speaking out and sharing viewpoints is suppose to be one of the most important parts of gp21 along with sharing values with those who differ from you in order to better understand your own personal values. This is what Drury has always told me since freshman year and is even on the evaluation forms we just did this last week. This is exactly the problem I have had with so many of these teachers that I have had who have signed this and gp21 in general. So many of them talk about learning personal values, sharing ideas, speaking up for change (to benefit the less fortunate only), going against what society says you should do and do what is right (again only if it benefits the environment, the poor, third world countries, or any other suppressed person) but as soon as you say something they don't agree with you get reprimanded and crucified in front of the class and you are WRONG!! If you don't think the world should be 100% equal, everyone should not be given everything, that gay marriage should not be allowed, that race and gender should not be a plus with getting accepted into professional school or with getting a job and that it should be all be truly "equal" because all of those things previously stated are not truly "equal" and promote inequality. You better be prepared to set aside your true thoughts, if you care about your grade, not say a word in class or you will fail the class. I do not know if the ideas expressed in the article in question are the feelings of the author or if they are just playing devils advocate but I enjoy reading all about all the things that are not truly equal and how they are exposing all the things that I have been afraid to ever say in my four years at this school. This is the expression I have wanted to say in every gp21 class since my first semester in alpha and I am glad someone is finally showing just how much these problems are still rooted in our society. If you can laugh at your mistakes then you have actually learned from them but if you shy away from them or become angered when they are brought up then the issue is still there. This letter from the faculty has shown just how much our faculty is not the channel for freedom of expression and thought to find our own values that we as students have been told. In truth they have been doing what I just mentioned, telling us our beliefs and the values we should have and when someone is finally brave enough to show this to the entire campus look has what has happened and look at those saying that this should stop. I have been told in all of my gp21 classes that causing discomfort is what causes change and that people have to be uncomfortable in order for real change to occur. Well this is it Drury University the "uncomfortable" you have always lectured about.






log out